Essay in Englisch

Ich muss in Englisch ein Essay schreiben…
Nun meine Fragen:

  • Sind da überflüssige Aspekte? Wenn ja welche?
  • Erfüllt das die Aufgabenstellung?
  • Ist sonst alles grammatikalisch richtig?
  • fehlt mir noch ein wesentlicher Aspekt?

Die Aufgabenstellung:
You are going to write an essay discussing the statement: ''A completely mixed-race population would make a better society than separate ethnic groups. Think about the effect a mixed-race population could have on issues like:

  • integration
  • people’s sense of identity
  • racial discrimination
  • how people are judged
  • local communities
  • individual cultures’’

Mein Essay:
Recently, there has been a lot of heated discussion about mixed race. Before the question whether a completely mixed-race population would make a better society than separate ethnic groups is discussed, it is important to realize a few basic points. First, it is not easy to define race, and to different people it means different things. Second, it is not even clear that separate ethnic groups exist. Purity of race as such does not exist because immigration has been so widespread really since the beginning of time. This raises the next question of when immigrants become truly integrated – is it from the 2nd or 3rd generation? But that is another issue we cannot discuss further here. So how might then a society become better? Is it in economic terms? Or just in terms of a greater multi-cultural diversity?
Britain has been described as multi-ethnic or multi-cultural. In 2001, more than 3 million people (about 5.5% of the population) belonged to ethnic minorities. Similarly, the USA has been called a nation of immigrants. Race riots and racial discrimination make it clear that prejudice is very often just beneath the surface. Such riots are often the result of lack of education and job opportunities. Commonwealth citizens were allowed to settle in the UK up to the 1960s, but this free access was stopped and laws such as the Immigration Act in 1971 were passed. But laws alone cannot enforce assimilation. This may point to an innate lack of possibility of total integration. But it cannot be denied that migrant workers are very often willing to do menial work that others won’t do. The children of immigrants work hard at school and try to succeed. On another level, immigrants very often bring their know-how and knowledge, which can also contribute to the economic growth of a country, which is positive.
On the one hand, if a white person and a person of Hispanic origin mix, their children may not absorb every aspect of both culture, rather they will inherit only certain aspects of the original cultures. Some aspects are bound to be lost. On the other, a certain diversity is added enriching the original culture. It is hard to say whether there is a net gain or loss. But people from such a background are usually at an advantage, especially if they grow up speaking both languages, in that they can explore other cultures and ways of thinking firsthand. They can understand society better, are more tolerant and are better able to cope in life.
There is no doubt that cultures that mix more will have more racial discrimination. That is the price modern societies pay. Discrimination can come in many forms, it may be just comments about a person’s colour or their accent. It may be due to the government’s laws or polices, as was the case with South Africa’s Apartheid regime and the segregation polices in schools and elsewhere in the USA up to the 50s. But, sooner or later, there is a process of assimilation. While it is true that some people have more difficulty learning the language of their hosts than others, and some languages are indeed harder to learn as well than others. This is not such a long-term potential barrier to (total) integration as say colour or appearance. This is because people may be quicker to judge others based on what they see rather than on what qualifications these people have.
A large influx of foreign workers, as seen in say London, will bring changes. Of course, such changes are not new and have been going on for a long time. But, fears that a local community may become overrun with foreigners are unfounded.
Racial intermingling may destroy the original culture, but it is far more likely to also add to it than change it.
In conclusion, a mixed-race population could make a better society overall than separate ethnic groups. Britain, the USA or Germany, where there has been a high level of immigration, are successful economically. They also have a high level of tolerance towards other cultures and religions, which helps reduce racism in the world. But, racial discrimination will still exist in such societies, so there will always be work to do. Maybe that is the price of their economic success and cultural diversity.

Danke im Voraus!

Ihr Lehrer will doch sicher wissen, was Sie können, nicht was Ihre Helfer können? Guttenberg lässt grüßen, Heinrich

Ich muss in Englisch ein Essay schreiben…
Nun meine Fragen:

  • Sind da überflüssige Aspekte? Wenn ja welche?
  • Erfüllt das die Aufgabenstellung?
  • Ist sonst alles grammatikalisch richtig?
  • fehlt mir noch ein wesentlicher Aspekt?

D

Also, grammatikalisch is alles korrekt, nur solltest su die Teilbereiche noch etwas besser durchleuchten, sprich etwas ausfürlicher darstellen. Ansonsten ein klasse Essay :wink:

Ich muss in Englisch ein Essay schreiben…
Nun meine Fragen:

  • Sind da überflüssige Aspekte? Wenn ja welche?
  • Erfüllt das die Aufgabenstellung?
  • Ist sonst alles grammatikalisch richtig?
  • fehlt mir noch ein wesentlicher Aspekt?

Die Aufgabenstellung
You are going to write an essay discussing the statement: ''A
completely mixed-race population would make a better society
than separate ethnic groups. Think about the effect a
mixed-race population could have on issues like:

  • integration
  • people’s sense of identity
  • racial discrimination
  • how people are judged
  • local communities
  • individual cultures’’

Mein Essay:
Recently, there has been a lot of heated discussion about
mixed race. Before the question whether a completely
mixed-race population would make a better society than
separate ethnic groups is discussed, it is important to
realize a few basic points. First, it is not easy to define
race, and to different people it means different things.
Second, it is not even clear that separate ethnic groups
exist. Purity of race as such does not exist because
immigration has been so widespread really since the beginning
of time. This raises the next question of when immigrants
become truly integrated – is it from the 2nd or 3rd
generation? But that is another issue we cannot discuss
further here. So how might then a society become better? Is it
in economic terms? Or just in terms of a greater
multi-cultural diversity?
Britain has been described as multi-ethnic or multi-cultural.
In 2001, more than 3 million people (about 5.5% of the
population) belonged to ethnic minorities. Similarly, the USA
has been called a nation of immigrants. Race riots and racial
discrimination make it clear that prejudice is very often just
beneath the surface. Such riots are often the result of lack
of education and job opportunities. Commonwealth citizens were
allowed to settle in the UK up to the 1960s, but this free
access was stopped and laws such as the Immigration Act in
1971 were passed. But laws alone cannot enforce assimilation.
This may point to an innate lack of possibility of total
integration. But it cannot be denied that migrant workers are
very often willing to do menial work that others won’t do. The
children of immigrants work hard at school and try to succeed.
On another level, immigrants very often bring their know-how
and knowledge, which can also contribute to the economic
growth of a country, which is positive.
On the one hand, if a white person and a person of Hispanic
origin mix, their children may not absorb every aspect of both
culture, rather they will inherit only certain aspects of the
original cultures. Some aspects are bound to be lost. On the
other, a certain diversity is added enriching the original
culture. It is hard to say whether there is a net gain or
loss. But people from such a background are usually at an
advantage, especially if they grow up speaking both languages,
in that they can explore other cultures and ways of thinking
firsthand. They can understand society better, are more
tolerant and are better able to cope in life.
There is no doubt that cultures that mix more will have more
racial discrimination. That is the price modern societies pay.
Discrimination can come in many forms, it may be just comments
about a person’s colour or their accent. It may be due to the
government’s laws or polices, as was the case with South
Africa’s Apartheid regime and the segregation polices in
schools and elsewhere in the USA up to the 50s. But, sooner or
later, there is a process of assimilation. While it is true
that some people have more difficulty learning the language of
their hosts than others, and some languages are indeed harder
to learn as well than others. This is not such a long-term
potential barrier to (total) integration as say colour or
appearance. This is because people may be quicker to judge
others based on what they see rather than on what
qualifications these people have.
A large influx of foreign workers, as seen in say London, will
bring changes. Of course, such changes are not new and have
been going on for a long time. But, fears that a local
community may become overrun with foreigners are unfounded.
Racial intermingling may destroy the original culture, but it
is far more likely to also add to it than change it.
In conclusion, a mixed-race population could make a better
society overall than separate ethnic groups. Britain, the USA
or Germany, where there has been a high level of immigration,
are successful economically. They also have a high level of
tolerance towards other cultures and religions, which helps
reduce racism in the world. But, racial discrimination will
still exist in such societies, so there will always be work to
do. Maybe that is the price of their economic success and
cultural diversity.

Danke im Voraus!

Leider bin ich da die falsche Person, das tut mir wirklich leid. Ich hoffe, es findet sich jemand, der weiter helfen kann.
VG

Hallo, fuglyliar

Ich nehme an, dass dein Essay für die Schule ist. Dafür sollte er im Großen und Ganzen in Ordnung sein. Für eine Fachhochschule oder Universität müsstest du ihn meiner Meinung nach wesentlich strukturierter schreiben und Begriffe wie „integrate“ klarer definieren.

Also, ich gehe jetzt mal davon aus, dass du den Text für die Schule brauchst. Meine Anmerkungen habe ich in eckige Klammern [] in den Text geschrieben.

Hoffentlich helfen dir meine Anmerkungen.

Beste Grüße.

Ich muss in Englisch ein Essay schreiben…
Nun meine Fragen:

  • Sind da überflüssige Aspekte? Wenn ja welche?
  • Erfüllt das die Aufgabenstellung?
  • Ist sonst alles grammatikalisch richtig?
  • fehlt mir noch ein wesentlicher Aspekt?

Die Aufgabenstellung:
You are going to write an essay discussing the statement: ''A
completely mixed-race population would make a better society
than separate ethnic groups. Think about the effect a
mixed-race population could have on issues like:

  • integration
  • people’s sense of identity
  • racial discrimination
  • how people are judged
  • local communities
  • individual cultures’’

Mein Essay:
Recently, there has been a lot of heated discussion about
mixed race [besser: different races mixing with each other]. Before the question whether a completely
mixed-race population would make a better society than
separate ethnic groups is discussed [Before discussing the question, whether…], it is important to
realize a few basic points [evtl. besser: facts]. First, it is not easy to define
race, and to different people it means different things. [Biologically speaking, there is only one race: the human race. For the sake of using common vocabulary, I will consider „race“ synonymous with „ethnic group“ for this text.]
Second, it is not even clear that separate ethnic groups
exist. Purity of race as such does not exist because
immigration [besser: migration] has been so widespread really since the beginning
of time [besser: since the beginning of recorded history]. This raises the next question of when immigrants
become truly integrated [meaning that they stop viewing themselves and stop being viewed as strangers by others] – is it from the 2nd or 3rd
generation? But that is another issue we cannot discuss
further here [Wieso nicht? Wäre nicht eine kurze Ausführung dazu sinnvoll?]. So how might then a society become better? Is it
in economic terms? Or just in terms of a greater
multi-cultural diversity?
Britain has been described as multi-ethnic or multi-cultural.
In 2001, more than 3 million people (about 5.5% of the
population) belonged to ethnic minorities. Similarly, the USA
has been called a nation of immigrants. Race riots and racial
discrimination make it clear that prejudice is very often just
beneath the surface. Such riots are often the result of lack
of education and job opportunities. Commonwealth citizens were
allowed to settle in the UK up to the 1960s, but this free
access was stopped and laws such as the Immigration Act in
1971 were passed. But laws alone cannot enforce assimilation. [Die letzten drei Punkte - Mulitkulturalität in Großbritannien, Ethnische Krawalle in den USA und Einwanderungsstop in Großbritannien - kommen etwas zu plötzlich nacheinander. Da wird der Zusammenhang nicht so richtig deutlich.]
This may point to an innate lack of possibility of total
integration. But it cannot be denied that migrant workers are
very often willing to do menial work that others [statt „others“ besser: members of the privileged ethnic and cultural majority] won’t do. The [streiche „The“]
children of immigrants work hard at school and try to succeed.
On another level, immigrants very often bring [along] their know-how
and knowledge, which can also contribute to the economic
growth of a country, which is positive.
On the one hand, if a white person and a person of Hispanic
origin mix [besser: have children together], their children [hier besser: offspring] may not absorb every aspect of both
culture, rather they will inherit only certain aspects of the
original cultures. Some aspects are bound to be lost. On the
other [hand], a certain diversity is added enriching the original
culture. It is hard to say whether there is a net gain or
loss. But people from such a background are usually at an
advantage, especially if they grow up speaking both languages,
in that they can explore other cultures and ways of thinking
firsthand. They can understand society better, are more
tolerant [Ich glaube nicht, dass man pauschal sagen kann, dass alle Menschen vermischter Abstammung toleranter sind.] and are better able to cope in life.
There is no doubt that cultures that mix more will have more
racial discrimination. That is the price modern societies pay. [Auch das halte ich für eine zu generelle Aussage. Sicher bringt es Probleme mit sich, wenn Fremde sich einander annähern. Aber durch das gegenseitige Kennenlernen werden auch immer wieder Vorurteile abgebaut, was zu mehr Harmonie führt.]
Discrimination can come in many forms, it may be just comments
about a person’s colour [ersetze durch: about the colour of a person’s skin] or their accent. It may be due to the
government’s [ersetze „the government’s“ durch "government] laws or polic[i]es, as was the case with South
Africa’s Apartheid regime and the segregation polic[i]es in
schools and elsewhere in the USA up to the 50s. But, sooner or
later, there is a process of assimilation. While it is true
that some people have more difficulty learning the language of
their hosts than others, and some languages are indeed harder
to learn as well [streiche „as well“] than others. This is not such a long-term
potential barrier to (total) integration as say [ersetze „say“ durch „for instance“] [skin-]colour or
appearance. This is because people may be quicker to judge
others based on what they see rather than on what
qualifications these people have.
A large influx of foreign workers, as seen in say [ersetze „say“ durch „for example“] London, will
bring changes. Of course, such changes are not new and have
been going on for a long time. But, fears that a local
community may become overrun with foreigners are unfounded [evtl. besser: unsubstantial].
Racial intermingling may destroy the original culture [Wo ist der Zusammenhang zwischen „Rasse“ und Kultur? Das sollte erklärt werden.], but it
is far more likely to also add to it than change it.
In conclusion, a mixed-race population could make a better
society overall than separate ethnic groups. Britain, the USA
or Germany, where there has been a high level of immigration,
are successful economically. They also have a high level of
tolerance towards other cultures and religions, which helps
reduce racism in the world. But, racial discrimination will
still exist in such societies, so there will always be work to
do. Maybe that is the price of their economic success and
cultural diversity. [Hier wäre es gut, noch einmal deutlicher zu beschreiben, wo genau in USA oder Deutschland Toleranz erkennbar ist und wo es Probleme mit Diskriminierung gibt. Ansonsten könnte es wie ein Widerspruch wirken, dass beides zusammen genannt wird.]

Danke im Voraus!

Hallo fuglyliar,

ich würde dir sehr gern mit deinem Essay helfen, allerdings denke ich nicht, dass wer-weiss-was.de für „proofreading“ gedacht ist. Ich las deinen ersten Paragraph. Deine Grammatik und Kommasetzung ist gut. Das Wort „really“ brauchst du nicht. Auch das Wort „then“, welches im Deutschen so benützt würde, klingt hier sehr awkward.

Es kommt auf deinen Lehrer an, aber normalerweise wird in einem solchen Essay keine erste Person genutzt. Man schreibt auch nicht darüber, was man schreibt oder nicht schreibt im Essay. Mit anderen Worten, „But that is another issue we cannot discuss further here,“ ist völlig überflüssig. Wenn es hier nicht diskutiert werden kann, dann führ es auch nicht an.

Ich hoffe, dieser kleine Ansatz hilft dir schonmal ein bisschen, und sorry für die späte Antwort.

Alles Gute.

Sorry, aber das ist mir zu viel. Ich bin froh, dass ich in diesen Ferien KEINE Essays oder sonstigen Klausuren korrigieren muss. Ich hab grad erst die ganzen Abikorrekturen hinter mich gebracht.
Viel Erfolg trotzdem!